A Week Late and A Story Short: "Whispering Trees"

This is not going to be a very good blog post.
This is not going to be a very good blog post. It is late, but that’s just a start. As with Scott and Ben, this is a story that left me with little to say; as with Keguro, it’s a story that left me expecting more, and feeling a little bad about it. Like Veronica, I never knew what to expect next in this story, as the text weaved together “one unexpected aspect of the ‘story’ to the next.” Like Beverly, it seemed to me that there was something distinctly timeless, placeless, and un-voiced about the narrative voice, and the story’s final line—a deadeningly duckbilled platitude of a freshly minted cliché—left me flat. I have lots of reactions, but nothing to say. And I did not have the charity to read it a second time; I will take Kola’s word for it… Read More...

Massively Open Online Police State

Not long ago, online surveillance and repression were interesting experiments. Now online activity is at the core of how these nation-states envision their futures.
Look, we'd all love to have actual police patrolling every neighborhood in the country, but in this economy, we have to face facts: costs are skyrocketing while the value provided by human police officers is falling, dramatically. The city of Oakland, for example, spends more than 40% of its annual budget on police functions alone, and yet the benefits of being policed by OPD officers has never been lower. Don't even get me started on the federal defense budget; those guys literally misplace billions of dollars and no one is the wiser. Across the country, police agencies are struggling to meet the demand for policing created by a modern economy and the ongoing persistent unemployment it requires. And if there is one lesson we should learn from our campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan, it's that boots on the ground are simply… Read More...

Sometimes a Suitcase is Just a Suitcase: On Pede Hollist's "Foreign Aid"

Most people are just regular old ugly and interesting.
What I like about short stories is that almost anything can make a story good. Or at least good enough. A novel needs to justify itself to you, needs to make the number of hours you’ll spend with that book worth it. Even if time isn’t money—and sometimes it is—it’s hard to get away from the fact that the time you spend reading a bad book is time not spent doing whatever it is that you never have time to do these days. But a short story can live or die by a single effect. A short can have flat characters, weak description, and be a bad version of some other story you’ve heard before, but if it does just one thing right, really right, it’s worth it. It’s a good story, or a good enough story. Pede Hollist’s “Foreign… Read More...

Miracles and Wonder, Faith and Diaspora: On Tope Folarin's "Miracle"

Week One of the Caine Prize Blogathon
This is week one of the "Blogging the Caine," in which I and a group of other writers write about the shortlist for this year's Caine Prize. Feel free to join the conversation, here, on twitter (#caineprize), or anywhere else. Send me an email (aaron AT thenewinquiry DOT com) if you'd like to mix it up with us, and see links to other participants in the right margin of this post. The first story, in alphabetical order, is Tope Folarin's "Miracle," which you can read in its entirety here. That “miracles” are not real is, I think, a secular assumption that many of Tope Folarin’s readers will share. Some of us might say that we believe in miracles, and we might enjoy indulging in the fantasy of divine intervention, or biblical stories that describe Jesus’ ability to turn water into… Read More...

Blogging the Caine, 2013

"Ah, the tyranny of mzungu prizes!"
Huzzah! Starting next week, I and a group of other illustriously self-selected writers will begin writing about the shortlisted short stories for the “Caine Prize for African Writing” (all of which are available for download as pdfs at that link). Join us! Some of us are academics, most of us are not, but all of us are basically just readers and writers, and you are one too. I’ve been calling it a “blog carnival,” but it basically just boils down to reading the stories in order, writing about them in whatever capacity we want to, reading each other writing about reading them, and then, perhaps, if we’re up to it, writing about that. Welcome. This is the third year we’re doing this—see here and here for the introductions for the last two years—and it’s been good fun. So far, Kate… Read More...

The MOOC Moment and the End of Reform

The MOOC phenomenon has happened very quickly, to put it mildly. Last November, the New York Times declared 2012 to be “the Year of the MOOC,” and while it feels (at least to me) like we’ve been talking about MOOCs for years now, the speed by which the MOOC has become the future of higher education is worth thinking carefully about, both because it’s an important way to frame what is happening, and because that speed warps the narrative we are able to tell about what is happening. Coursera, Udacity, and edX are all less than a year old, and while the first two—which are silicon valley startups out of Stanford, essentially—have already enrolled millions of students, the non-profit consortium edX has grown just as prodigiously. Beginning as a partnership between Harvard and MIT, it now includes a dozen different… Read More...

Bartleby in the University of California: The Social Life of Disobedience

(a slightly enriched version of a talk I gave at this lovely symposium, put on by the lovely people at the BABEL working group and at UC Irvine) I’m interested in thinking about “critique” as disobedience—or disobedience as “critique”—and what that would mean. Disobedience is an interesting concept, because it’s different than opposition or defiance. It can be passive. It can be apathy. It’s not necessarily even an action: the simple absence of obedience has a power all its own, disobedience as inaction or disinterest. Let me start with an iconic example. In Melville’s “Bartleby the Scrivener,” Bartleby is not a revolutionary, nor a striking worker. What he does is not even action, because it’s legible only as negation: he disobeys in the sense that he does not obey, registering his negative preference (his preference not to) and declining to comply with… Read More...

Clear Satire

The glass is always half full, and we always round up.
What is “satire” anyway? When the whole Oscars/Onion fiasco happened, my friend Jonathan vented his frustration to me about what he saw as the term and its misuse; an amateur comedian himself, he had come to decide that “satire” simply isn’t a thing, and that when people say any variation on “Well, it’s clearly satire,” they are talking nonsense. There is nothing clear about satire, he declared to me--at great and convincing length--and this fact is central to what satire is (or, rather, what it isn’t). Because what satire isn’t is: a genre. Novels, tragedies, sonnets, horror movies, musical theater, and so on are all genres which you can identify as such by pointing to a fairly limited set of formal features that identify them, features which can be more or less treated as objective (a novel is a long,… Read More...

Chinua Achebe and the Damnation of Faint Praise

In an interview a few years ago, Norman Rush was talking about the ways he was influenced by African writers, and he mentioned that “No non-African could do what Achebe has done.” And I get what he was saying. But there’s also a back-handedness to this compliment that makes me nervous. Here’s the thing: Achebe was just a great writer, full stop. I’m not sure anyone could do what he did. And while it  may seem like a small point, like complaining that a genuine compliment just isn’t enough of a compliment, there’s an important point of which it’s in service, a larger issue of who gets to “know” what sorts of knowledges and why. It diminishes his achievement to pretend that white writers don’t write about the things he wrote about, because if Rush’s novels (or any post-war white novelist) had to be placed next to… Read More...

Who are you going to believe, me or your lying ideology?

“there are two sides to everything...people dont just act like this for no reason...I guarantee you the professor was reacting to something that isnt shown in this video”
Ideology means many things, but one of them is the difference between who gets the maximum benefit of the doubt, and who gets the presumption of guilt. I know what I see, when I see this clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWKoS2B-u0M I see a law professor shoving a student—shouting “Get away from my space, you prick”—making more threatening movements, attempting to provoke a fight verbally, and grabbing a student’s cell phone out of her hand. I see the student who was pushed and threatened staying calm and passive, even trying to defuse the situation. I see the student whose phone was taken from her hands defending herself verbally and no more. And then the clip ends. It is clear to me what I see in the video. It is clear to me who, in the video, is turning a political conflict into a… Read More...

Sunday Reading

I link, therefore I am.
ReclaimUC: In-state undergraduates at UC pay in tuition "nearly twice what it cost the University to provide their education" Monsanto University Oberlin cancellation of classes was demanded by students of color / Oberlin microagressions The university as a site of struggle: On occupying in a Midwest college town Virginia's evangelical mega-university Education in the streets Anatomy of a failed campus: NYU in Asia How Washington could make college tuition free without spending a penny more on education Abolish the SAT The professor, the bikini model, and the suitcase full of trouble Student protesters Alfie Meadows and Zak King found not guilty!!! How cops became soldiers The racist history of the entrapment defense The austerity question: Work, welfare, and post-family life nathan jurgenson "The commodity markets of capitalism have made being truly different as difficult as space travel, and being merely different as… Read More...

Sunday Reading

If you prick us, do we not read?
L.E. Long: What is yours / How to get it Dear Sheryl Sandberg: "Leaning In" Doesn't Fix What's Actually Broken for Working Women Crisis and domestic work (On self-reduction, shoplifting, and other forms of gender war) "In fact, while for the male worker, his reproduction and reintegration is always assured, the woman is the only worker for whom these moments [of reproduction and reintegration] are not assured: she must, in practice, self-reproduce as labor-power throughout her entire life, whether within the house or outside it." "...clear instances of violent acts for private ends, the very embodiment of piracy." “Have prisons and jails become the mass housing of our time?” I Didn't Do Anything - The Fight for Alan Blueford (video) Against Hired Guns: A six-part series on policing and violence in Oakland "In our attempts to curb police violence solely through… Read More...

Sunday Reading

Oscar the Grouch.
ReclaimUC: "Thanks to Berkeley…": Managing multiculturalism in an age of austerity "Hidden behind a false wall and a fast-food restaurant, large black and brown images depict the faces of seven UCLA alumni, symbolizing the struggle of social activism and black history." Fitch gives UC bonds AA+ rating, and the university still takes its marching orders from the bond raters Florida Atlantic University joins the prison-industrial complex As growth shifts into overdrive, NYU faces a rebellion from within Historicizing the Yale torture center and the administrative response Immigration activists to Yale: "We're not lab rats" Michelle Rhee donates significantly—to the tune of $250k—to L.A. school board races The student body, for sale The PhD bust in 7 charts Antebellism: The neoliberal compromise of the political Disaster capitalism in the Chicago public schools Michelle Alexander on the school-to-prison pipeline "At the end of December, about… Read More...

James Wagner's "highest aspiration"

It’s interesting that we are upset when the president of Emory University talks about the 3/5ths compromise.
It’s interesting that we are upset when the president of Emory University talks about the 3/5ths compromise—one of the marks of this country’s white supremacist origins, the place where racial slavery is literally written into the constitution—as a model for exemplary political behavior. When he uses that historical example to argue for the necessity of continuing cuts to the liberal arts, we are upset, unsettled, enraged, astonished. Should we be? Of course, it is a very stupid thing for James Wagner to write, full stop, and not simply because of the deep and profound level of historical ignorance it demonstrates. After all, the reference doesn’t even work on its own terms: the 3/5ths compromise, like the compromise of 1850, utterly failed at solving the conflict over slavery, whose bloody resolution it only delayed, intensified, and made all the more inevitable.… Read More...

Sunday Reading

nathan jurgenson: “Facebook has certainly taken notice of the desire for impermanence” “It’s interesting that we now create things specifically to forget” “networks can be far more tyrannical, opaque, and anti-democratic than hierarchies” “Snapchat subverts the affordances of networked publics…the technology now—not the recipient—is the trusted object” “using the magic word “MOOC,” the privatization disappears in a puff of euphemism. We are instead “expanding access”” “Just as CafePress can sell you a customized T-Shirt, why shouldn’t OKCupid aspire to sell you a customized partner?” “use online connectivity not to try to define ourselves perfectly but to undo ourselves over and over” “social media seem to intersect interpersonal sociality and corporate monetization” “they all took snapshots and movies of each other out of fear of experiencing the meaninglessness of their existence” "And that song was just the apology for being misogynist… Read More...

Tree Sitting

MOOC’s are a word for forgetting that universities have never grown without being planted.
Clay Shirky observed at the Awl last week that he and I disagree over whether the trend toward MOOCs in higher education is reversible—he says no, and he says that I say yes—and I suppose he’s right, so far as that goes. But I don’t think that goes very far. So I want to shift the debate a bit. Shirky thinks in terms of “disruption” and what can come of it, in theory. I think in terms of what the “disruption” of the University of California system looks like in practice, as a complex of politicians, financiers, and career administrators move in lock-step to transform it into a self-sufficient corporate entity, and to enrich private industry in the bargain. I see a group of decision-makers who quite manifestly do not know what they are talking about and who barely try to disguise it, for… Read More...